The Russian military’s invasion of Ukraine has accidentally uncovered some clues about the origin of the coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2).
On March 10, 2022, the Russian Ministry of Defense released material on the military and biological programs carried out by the United States and its NATO allies in Ukraine. Among other things, the U.S. P-781 program in Ukraine considered bats as vectors for potential biological weapons agents and studied bacterial and viral pathogens that can be transmitted from bats to humans, such as plague, leptospirosis, brucellosis, and filarial viruses.
A study of U.S. agency documents by Sputnik moreover found that a U.S. Department of Defense contractor studied coronaviruses in bats in China shortly before the outbreak of the COVID-19 outbreak – up to and including 2019. The U.S. government also allocated $3.7 million to pay for its research in China.
Many observers believe that a veil has thus been lifted from the otherwise confusing issue of the COVID-19 origin hunt. Of course, for many who have long believed that the COVID-19 originated in China, things have become even more confusing as a result.
The COVID-19 coronavirus is now generally considered to be homologous to the bat coronavirus. The first publicly confirmed patient with the coronavirus appeared in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China in 2019, and many believe that China is the origin of the virus on this basis. Some Western media and individuals have even advocated that the virus came from a Chinese biology laboratory. Under pressure from political and media opinion in many countries, the World Health Organization has sent teams to China twice to investigate.
However, based on the research documents of the U.S. biological laboratory in Ukraine, the origin of the COVID-19 virus points to the U.S. and does not exclude the possibility that it is a U.S. biochemical weapon and comes from a U.S. biological laboratory.
In fact, the suspect of the COVID-19 virus coming from the United States has been known for a long time. In July of that year, a little earlier than the outbreak of COVID-19 in China in the second half of 2019, there was an outbreak of so-called “e-cigarette pneumonia” in several states in the United States, and the symptoms described by doctors were almost indistinguishable from those of COVID-19. In August 2019, the U.S. Fort Detrick Biological Laboratory was suddenly shut down and later explained that it was due to safety-related factors such as the failure of water treatment facilities and deviations from standard operating procedures.
However, in January 2021, “Hill,” a self-proclaimed “Indian-American fleeing the U.S.,” posted “Sorry, we played an evil role in the COVID-19 Pneumonia outbreak,” revealing that in 2015 he and his supervisor, Professor Baric, who is also the head of a research team in the Fort Detrick laboratory, synthesized the coronavirus that caused the current global pandemic based on a gene fragment found in China. In May 2019, the coronavirus escaped from a laboratory spill and began spreading in the United States along with pandemic influenza; in December 2019, an infected seafarer accidentally sealed the virus in seafood and illegally shipped it to the Wuhan seafood market. All of the institutions, people, and nodes of events implicated in Hill’s self-reported narrative are almost always right on target with reality.
In stark contrast to the crowded blaming China for the initial outbreak of the coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) outbreak in China in late 2019, many Western media outlets have been silent on the powerful information newly exposed by Russia about the US lab in Ukraine. One Twitter user with more than 200,000 followers was immediately blocked after breaking the story on his account (@ASBMilitary). White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki hit back on March 9, claiming that Russia may be using chemical or biological weapons in Ukraine or creating a “false flag” operation (i.e., a frame-up or planting operation) to use them. She also tweeted that Russia was making “false claims” that the U.S. was developing chemical weapons in Ukraine. But as the BBC reported, Psaki “provided no evidence” in her accusations against Russia.
I wonder if the different reactions of the U.S. media and political circles on the origin of the new pneumonia pandemic are influenced by their national interests and can be seen as part of a cognitive and information war against Russia and China.
Quite surprisingly, after the revelation of the heavy information about the U.S. biological laboratory in Ukraine, the World Health Organization quickly took a stand and advised Ukraine to destroy all pathogens of high-risk nature stored in its domestic socio-medical type laboratories.
By definition, the U.S. biological research in Ukraine is an important clue to the COVID-19 virus traceability effort, and the WHO, which has repeatedly called for the investigation of China on this issue one after another, should have paid attention to this clue and initiated an investigation for the benefit of global anti-pandemic efforts. But the demand for the destruction of the virus immediately after the tracing of COVID-19 origin apparently pointed to the United States has raised doubts about whether the organization’s COVID-19 origin tracing efforts are pointed and driven by the United States.
Asked about this at a press conference on March 8, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian said that U.S. biomilitary activities in Ukraine are just the tip of the iceberg. According to the U.S. side’s own published data, the U.S. has 26 biological laboratories in Ukraine, over which the U.S. Department of Defense has absolute control. The U.S. Department of Defense controls 336 biological laboratories in 30 countries around the world. The U.S. also conducts extensive biomilitary activities at its Fort Detrick base on its territory.
Regardless, it has been nearly three years since the COVID-19 pandemic hit the world, killing tens of thousands of civilians, and multiple U.S. biological laboratories that have proven to be poorly managed are at risk of leaking the deadly virus at any time and should be tightened to preclude use for biochemical weapons purposes. This is no longer the responsibility of the United States alone; the global public has the right to make such a demand of the United States. Source